News Categories
(34)Malware (39)Malicious emails (11)Web 2.0 (24)Facebook (22)Social Networks (44)Spam (2)Defensio (1)Comment Spam (15)Phishing (9)Web spam (4)Click-jacking (38)Compromise (20)Analysis (38)Exploits (14)Research (3)Presentations (3)Conferences (4)security conference (9)Mass Injection (10)Rogue AV (4)Blackhat SEO (2)Neosploit (23)Targeted attacks (7)Video (14)Zeus (5)Microsoft (4)Monthly Reports (1)twitter (3)Google (18)Vulnerabilities (9)Adobe (12)Java (4)Mobile (4)Apple (1)hacked (1)TAB (1)Black Hat USA 2011 (1)Google+ (20)0-day (1)CVE-2010-2884 (1)CVE-2011-1255 (1)Worm (14)Blackhole exploit kit (1)Incognit Exploit kit (2)Tuesday Patch (6)APT (6)Typosquatting (3)Vulnerability Analysis (1)CVE-2011-3402 (4)Web Research (4)Predictions (3)Adult (5)News (3)Black Hat SEO (6)Data loss (8)Scam (1)QR codes (6)Twitter (1)CVE-2012-0003 (1)CVE-2011-3389 (1)CVE-2012-0004 (1)Phoenix Exploit Kit (1)CrimePack (3)Reverse Engineering (2)Captcha (1)Valentine's day (2)Kelihos (1)SC Magazine Award Winner (1)Wordpress (1)MS12-010 (1)CVE-2012-0002 (1)Infosec (2)CVE-2012-0507 (8)Toolkits (1)Skywiper (2)Flame (1)Flamer (2)Passwords (1)freedom of expression (1)censorship (2)Plugins (3)Malvertising (14)Exploit (1)CVE-2012-1723 (1)CSI (2)ThreatSeeker (2)Adventures in Spam (1)CVE-2012-4681 (1)LBS (2)RAT (1)module Apache/2 (1)Cyber Monday (1)Black Friday (1)Pastebin (4)CVE-2012-4792 (1)iPad (1)super bowl (1)iPhone (2)iOS (4)Spear Phishing (1)Threat Report (3)ThreatScope (1)Dynamic DNS (1)China (1)SSL (1)APT1 (2)DLP (3)Hack (1)CVE-2012-4969 (2)threat lifecycle (1)ThreatSeeker Network (1)ACE (10)exploit kit (1)blackhole (2)Black Hole (1)DNS poisoning (1)RedKit Exploit Kit (4)exploit kits (1)threat stages (1)Certificates (1)Topical (1)Waterhole (1)CVE-2013-2463 (1)Neutrino exploit kit (1)CVE-2013-2473 (1)CVE-2013-3893 (2)Collective Threat Intelligence (1)CVE-2013-3963 (1)Targeted Attack (3)Advanced Malware (1)CVE-2013-3897 (1)Tor (5)cyber-crime (1)Mevade (2)Ransomware (3)Social Engineering (1)CookieBomb (2)LinkedIn (1)CVE-2013-3906 (2)Pony (3)Cryptolocker (2)Upatre (1)application telemetry (1)meta-data (3)dr. watson (1)windows error reporting (1)big data (2)data theft prevention (1)DTP (1)telemetry (2)CVE-2014-0322 (2)MSIE 0-day (1)Deputy Dog (1)Ephemeral Hydra (1)CVE-2013-0074 (1)CVE-2013-3896 (1)Silverlight (2)crash reports (1)POS (1)anomaly detection (1)goon (4)angler (1)ru:8080 (1)magnitude (3)flash (1)CVE-2013-2465 (1)malicious iframes (1)FIESTA (1)Exploits Kit (1)iframe (3)CVE-2014-0160 (2)OpenSSL (3)Heartbleed (3)Citadel (2)CVE-2014-1776 (1)VGX.DLL (1)necrus (1)cutwail (2)gameover (3)vulnerability (3)zbot (1)control panel (1)carberp (1)zberp (1)Caphaw (2)Nuclear exploit kit (1)Shylock (1)Dragonfly (1)Zeus PIF (1)bitly (1)fraud (2)RIG Exploit Kit (1)POS malware (1)Point Of Sale Malware (1)Ukraine (1)Russia (1)Shellshock (1)CVE-2014-6271 (1)poodle (1)cve-2014-3566 (1)sslv3 (1)Ebola (1)CVE-2014-4114 (1)CPA (1)Regin (1)CVE-2015-0311 (1)CVE-2015-0235 (1)linux (1)GHOST (1)CVE-2015-0072 (1)Internet Explorer (1)XSS (1)IE (1)TorrentLocker (1)Product Information (1)Money Laundering (1)APSA10-05 (1)Skype spam
RSS Feed
News
Jan
30
Trojan caught on camera shows CAPTCHA is still a security issue
Posted by Elad Sharf on 30 January 2012 07:30 AM

 

In a series of blogs a few years back, we covered how malware could abuse and circumvent online services that use CAPTCHA tests as part of their security (1 2). In this blog, we take a look at a recent malware variant from the wild caught on camera that shows CAPTCHA tests used by some online services are still weak and can be broken by malware.

 

The image below (Picture 1) shows this CAPTCHA breaking malware's ecosystem, which we'll describe step by step. Step 1: The starting point of an infection is a banking Trojan variant known as Cridex. This variant is propagated via malicious email messages that hold shortened links leading to exploit kits (see this example), in our case the Blackhole exploit kit. Step 2: If the exploit is successful, the Cridex variant is downloaded to the machine. Step 3: Cridex runs on the machine. Step 4: Cridex is a data-stealing Trojan that is similar to Zeus in the way it operates: It logs content from Web sessions and alters them to harvest information from the infected user. The Cridex configuration file downloaded by this variant (safe to view and download and shortened here) shows which websites the variant monitors and steals data from, along with Web form injection points (data alteration injected into Web forms to harvest additional data like ATM PIN numbers). We have observed that Facebook, Twitter, and many banking services are targets. A partial list of targeted websites can be found here. Step 5: Any stolen data from the system is uploaded to a command and control server.

 

Picture 1: The Cridex ecosystem:

 

Step 6: One of the components downloaded by Cridex with the configuration file is a propagation module or spamming module that allows the botmaster to send spam/malicious emails to infect other systems and increase the bot size. The spamming module holds backdoor components that allow browsing activities in the name of the user. The module opens Web sessions to online mail services and registers new email accounts that are later used by the bot to send spam/malicious emails. As we know, online mail services hold security checks like CAPTCHA challenges to verify that a human is indeed behind any account registration. Step 7: According to our findings, CAPTCHA challenges in some cases can be broken with the help of a CAPTCHA-breaking server, which allows the bot to register a mail account or address after only a few attempts. This video documents the registration of an online mail account by the bot on an infected machine:

 

Video:

Click here to watch the video on Youtube

(Please visit the site to view this media)

 

 

The CAPTCHA-breaking process consists of posting CAPTCHA challenge images harvested from the online email registration form to a remote Web server (the CAPTCHA-breaking server). The request is an HTTP POST with an embedded CAPTCHA image posted to the CAPTCHA-breaking server. Once the server processes the image, it outputs a response in JSON format with the CAPTCHA text result that responds to the submitted image (see Picture 2). The backdoor component then tries to use that returned CAPTCHA text result in the online email account registration form. In case the CAPTCHA-breaking server output is wrong and does not correspond to the CAPTCHA image challenge, the process continues and the next CAPTCHA image challenge is submitted until the server manages to break the CAPTCHA. You can look at Picture 3 to see the images submitted to the CAPTCHA-breaking server and the corresponding results from the server. Not all the attempts succeed in breaking the CAPTCHA, but some do and in our example you see it took 6 attempts.

 

The malware reports to the CAPTCHA-breaking server whether the result it got actually broke the CAPTCHA. Picture 4 shows HTTP requests that report back to the CAPTCHA-breaking server whether the CAPTCHA result the server gave in previous sessions was indeed successful in breaking the CAPTCHA. A successful CAPTCHA break is signed with the r parameter: If the parameter is 0 (&r=0), the CAPTCHA break attempt was unsuccessful, whereas if the parameter is (&r=1), the CAPTCHA break attempt was a success.

 

Picture 2: An HTTP POST request of an image to the CAPTCHA-breaking server and the response from the server

 

Picture 3: The images posted to the CAPTCHA-breaking server and their corresponding results

 

Picture 4: The malware reports to the CAPTCHA-breaking server if the CAPTCHA break attempt was successful

 

Websense® customers are protected from these threats by ACE™, our Advanced Classification Engine.

 


Read more »



Nov
17
2012 Cyber Security Predictions from the Websense Security Labs
Posted by Patrik Runald on 17 November 2011 11:03 PM

With all of the crazy 2011 security breaches, exploits and notorious hacks, what can we expect for 2012? Last year’s Websense Security Labs predictions were very accurate, so these predictions should provide very useful guidance for security professionals. Here are the highlights; the full report can be downloaded here.

 

1. Your social media identity may prove more valuable to cybercriminals than your credit cards. Bad guys will actively buy and sell social media credentials in online forums.

Trust is the basis of social networking, so if a bad guy compromises your social media log-ins, there is a good chance they can manipulate your friends. Which leads us to prediction #2.

 

2. The primary blended attack method used in the most advanced attacks will be to go through your social media “friends,” mobile devices and through the cloud.

We’ve already seen one APT attack that used the chat functionality of a compromised social network account to get to the right user. Expect this to be the primary vector, along with mobile and cloud exploits, in the most persistent and advanced attacks of 2012.

 

3. 1,000+ different mobile device attacks coming to a smartphone or tablet near you.

People have been predicting this for years, but in 2011 it actually started to happen. And watch out: the number of people who fall victim to believable social engineering scams will go through the roof if the bad guys find a way to use mobile location-based services to design hyperspecific geolocation social engineering attempts.

 

4. SSL/TLS will put net traffic into a corporate IT blind spot.

Two items are increasing traffic over SSL/TLS secure tunnels for privacy and protection. First is the disruptive growth of mobile and tablet devices. And second, many of the largest, most commonly used websites, like Google, Facebook, and Twitter are switching to https sessions by default, ostensibly a more secure transmission. But as more traffic moves through encrypted tunnels, many traditional enterprise security defenses are going to be left looking for a threat needle in a haystack, since they cannot inspect the encoded traffic.

 

5. Containment is the new prevention.

For years, security defenses have focused on keeping cybercrime and malware out. Organizations on the leading edge will implement outbound inspection and will focus on adapting prevention technologies to be more about containment, severing communications, and data loss mitigation after an initial infection.

 

6. The London Olympics, U.S. presidential elections, Mayan calendar, and apocalyptic predictions will lead to broad attacks by criminals.

Cybercriminals will continue to take advantage of today’s 24-hour, up-to-the minute news cycle, only now they will infect users where they are less suspicious: sites designed to look like legitimate news services, Twitter feeds, Facebook posts/emails, LinkedIn updates, YouTube video comments, and forum conversations.

 

7. Social engineering and rogue anti-virus will continue to reign.

Scareware tactics and the use of rogue anti-virus, which decreased a bit in 2011, will stage a comeback. Except, instead of seeing “You have been infected” pages, we anticipate three areas will emerge as growing scareware subcategories in 2012: a growth in fake registry clean-up, fake speed improvement software, and fake back-up software mimicking popular personal cloud backup systems.

 

You can also watch a video of the Websense Security Labs discussing the predictions here:

 

(Please visit the site to view this media)

Read more »