News Categories
(34)Malware (39)Malicious emails (11)Web 2.0 (24)Facebook (22)Social Networks (44)Spam (2)Defensio (1)Comment Spam (15)Phishing (9)Web spam (4)Click-jacking (38)Compromise (20)Analysis (38)Exploits (14)Research (3)Presentations (3)Conferences (4)security conference (9)Mass Injection (10)Rogue AV (4)Blackhat SEO (2)Neosploit (23)Targeted attacks (7)Video (14)Zeus (5)Microsoft (4)Monthly Reports (1)twitter (3)Google (18)Vulnerabilities (9)Adobe (12)Java (4)Mobile (4)Apple (1)hacked (1)TAB (1)Black Hat USA 2011 (1)Google+ (20)0-day (1)CVE-2010-2884 (1)CVE-2011-1255 (1)Worm (14)Blackhole exploit kit (1)Incognit Exploit kit (2)Tuesday Patch (6)APT (6)Typosquatting (3)Vulnerability Analysis (1)CVE-2011-3402 (4)Web Research (4)Predictions (3)Adult (5)News (3)Black Hat SEO (6)Data loss (8)Scam (1)QR codes (6)Twitter (1)CVE-2012-0003 (1)CVE-2011-3389 (1)CVE-2012-0004 (1)Phoenix Exploit Kit (1)CrimePack (3)Reverse Engineering (2)Captcha (1)Valentine's day (2)Kelihos (1)SC Magazine Award Winner (1)Wordpress (1)MS12-010 (1)CVE-2012-0002 (1)Infosec (2)CVE-2012-0507 (8)Toolkits (1)Skywiper (2)Flame (1)Flamer (2)Passwords (1)freedom of expression (1)censorship (2)Plugins (3)Malvertising (14)Exploit (1)CVE-2012-1723 (1)CSI (2)ThreatSeeker (2)Adventures in Spam (1)CVE-2012-4681 (1)LBS (2)RAT (1)module Apache/2 (1)Cyber Monday (1)Black Friday (1)Pastebin (4)CVE-2012-4792 (1)iPad (1)super bowl (1)iPhone (2)iOS (4)Spear Phishing (1)Threat Report (3)ThreatScope (1)Dynamic DNS (1)China (1)SSL (1)APT1 (2)DLP (3)Hack (1)CVE-2012-4969 (2)threat lifecycle (1)ThreatSeeker Network (1)ACE (10)exploit kit (1)blackhole (2)Black Hole (1)DNS poisoning (1)RedKit Exploit Kit (4)exploit kits (1)threat stages (1)Certificates (1)Topical (1)Waterhole (1)CVE-2013-2463 (1)Neutrino exploit kit (1)CVE-2013-2473 (1)CVE-2013-3893 (2)Collective Threat Intelligence (1)CVE-2013-3963 (1)Targeted Attack (3)Advanced Malware (1)CVE-2013-3897 (1)Tor (5)cyber-crime (1)Mevade (2)Ransomware (3)Social Engineering (1)CookieBomb (2)LinkedIn (1)CVE-2013-3906 (2)Pony (3)Cryptolocker (2)Upatre (1)application telemetry (1)meta-data (3)dr. watson (1)windows error reporting (1)big data (2)data theft prevention (1)DTP (1)telemetry (2)CVE-2014-0322 (2)MSIE 0-day (1)Deputy Dog (1)Ephemeral Hydra (1)CVE-2013-0074 (1)CVE-2013-3896 (1)Silverlight (2)crash reports (1)POS (1)anomaly detection (1)goon (4)angler (1)ru:8080 (1)magnitude (3)flash (1)CVE-2013-2465 (1)malicious iframes (1)FIESTA (1)Exploits Kit (1)iframe (3)CVE-2014-0160 (2)OpenSSL (3)Heartbleed (3)Citadel (2)CVE-2014-1776 (1)VGX.DLL (1)necrus (1)cutwail (2)gameover (3)vulnerability (3)zbot (1)control panel (1)carberp (1)zberp (1)Caphaw (2)Nuclear exploit kit (1)Shylock (1)Dragonfly (1)Zeus PIF (1)bitly (1)fraud (2)RIG Exploit Kit (1)POS malware (1)Point Of Sale Malware (1)Ukraine (1)Russia (1)Shellshock (1)CVE-2014-6271 (1)poodle (1)cve-2014-3566 (1)sslv3 (1)Ebola (1)CVE-2014-4114 (1)CPA (1)Regin (1)CVE-2015-0311 (1)CVE-2015-0235 (1)linux (1)GHOST (1)CVE-2015-0072 (1)Internet Explorer (1)XSS (1)IE (1)TorrentLocker (1)Product Information (1)Money Laundering (1)APSA10-05 (1)Skype spam
RSS Feed
News
Jun
12
Believe it or not—even MORE internet porn
Posted by RM on 12 June 2012 09:49 PM

 

In December of 2011, we blogged about the approval of the .xxx TLD (top-level domain) and discussed issues related to how these sites are categorized and how legitimate companies could avoid having their reputation damaged through an .xxx registration.

 

Under the banner "The Evolution of Online Responsibility," ICM Registry, the company behind .xxx, is now trying to establish .sex, .porn, and .adult to expand its online offerings. A company spokesman says it is prepared to battle for other sex-related TLDs in order to protect its turf, citing the firm's security and trademark protection practices, as well as its zero-tolerance policy toward child sex abuse.

...(read more)
Read more »



May
3
Widespread malware abuses unsecured Geolocation Service of Adult Website
Posted by Armin Buescher on 03 May 2012 11:56 PM

While researching outbound malware communications to improve detections for our products, we recently made an interesting discovery. Thousands of samples running in our malware lab reached out to the URL promos.fling.com/geo/txt/city.php. At first we suspected this to be a command and control (C&C) server of botnet malware. However,  Websense® categorization of the main Web page of the domain fling.com returned Adult, and visiting the page certainly confirmed this:

 

 

The self-proclaimed "Hottest Place to Hook Up" suggested that we sign up to "Meet the Hottest Members in San Diego" (the location of the US Websense® Security Labs™). This is where the originally discovered URL promos.fling.com/geo/txt/city.php comes into play. Directly visiting the URL results in JavaScript code to print the geolocation of the visitor:

 

 

So how is this unsecured geolocation service used by the malware? Using the network tool Wireshark to look at the malware network traffic contacting this service, we can see that more information is disclosed:

 

 

In this example our malware sandbox was connected to the Internet through a proxy service in Canada. Apart from the JavaScript payload there are several HTTP cookies sent in the response header specifying the country, state, city, latitude and longitude. Our analysis systems identified other likely C&C connections in the outbound connections of the malware samples in question. Interestingly, these connections try to hide the malicious HTTP using a forged user-agent string:

 

 

Looking at the geolocation service abused by the malware we can make the connection that the 'CA' part (country code for Canada) in this user-agent is used to disclose the geolocation of the infected machine to the botnet server. This information can be used by the botmaster for statistics or to give different commands to infected machines in certain countries.

 

As of the time of writing this blog post, a total of 4,775 samples that ran in our malware lab show connections to the adult geolocation service in question. Websense customers are protected against known variants of this malware; we also have real-time coverage in place for the traffic between the malware and the C&C servers.


Read more »